Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? touhou 2581
Character
- ? flandre scarlet 67
Artist
- ? kenpi 23
General
- ? blonde hair 38496
- ? blush 42328
- ? bottomless 44862
- ? dazed 13981
- ? empty eyes 40207
- ? expressionless 23514
- ? female only 66057
- ? femsub 154720
- ? hat 8193
- ? heart 13269
- ? heart eyes 11175
- ? long hair 66571
- ? open clothes 6332
- ? panties 9708
- ? ponytail 14702
- ? shirt lift 1997
- ? sweat 13845
- ? symbol in eyes 35672
- ? underwear 12499
- ? wings 4146
Meta
- ? text 95506
- ? translation request 8698
Statistics
- Id: 28078
-
Posted: 2015-08-04 01:10:14
by Mindwipe - Size: 777x1087
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=51770332
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #65714
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65718
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Need lolicon tag.
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
>> #65723
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
I politely disagree. It does look underage to me - not outright "child", but nowhere near "adult".
Better to be safe than sorry.
>> #65724
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65725
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65734
Score: 0 (vote Up)
And I'm going to keep removing the tag, because she is far too developed in this pic to be a loli. She has very clearly-defined breasts and wide hips. Lolis have flat chests and practically no curve to their figure at all. Honestly, the breasts alone disqualify this from being loli.
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
>> #65735
Score: 0 (vote Up)
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
>> #65738
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
And I still argue it fits "looks prepubescent" to a T. "generally marked by" =/= "always has this".
>> #65739
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
>> #65740
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
Except I'm arguing the other way in this case - this picture needs a loli tag because she (to me, at least) appears prepubescent. This is then verified by other pictures that have already gotten a loli tag and have roughly the same build of body.